4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hurdles in bacteriophage therapy: Deconstructing the parameters

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 171, Issue 3-4, Pages 460-469

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.11.001

Keywords

Phage therapy; Phage translocation; State of bacteria in vivo; Phage kinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial infections in animals impact our food production, leading to economic losses due to food rejection and the need for preventive and curative measures. Since the onset of the antibiotic era, the rise of antibiotic-resistant pathogens is causing scares in health care and food producing facilities worldwide. In the search of new therapeutics, re-evaluation of bacteriophage (phage) therapy, using naturally occurring bacterial viruses to tackle infections, is gaining interest. Many studies report about phage therapy success, showing the value and power of these natural viruses. Although phages carry some interesting traits and their basic biology is now well understood, this review argues that phage therapy has not revealed all of its secrets and many parameters remain understudied, making the outcome of phage therapy highly variable depending on the disease incidence. These difficulties include poorly understood mechanisms of phage penetration and distribution throughout the body, the variable expression and accessibility of phage receptors on the bacterial host in in vivo conditions and the unusual (non-linear) phage pharmacokinetics. These parameters are not easily measured in realistic in vivo settings, but are nevertheless important hurdles to overcome the high variability of phage therapy trials. This critical approach is in accordance with Goethe's statement; Difficulties increase the nearer we get to the goal. However, since the importance of the goal itself also rises, both difficulties and goal justify the need for additional in depth research in this domain. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available