4.7 Article

Rare serotype occurrence and PFGE genotypic diversity of Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from tilapia in China

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 3-4, Pages 719-724

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.09.001

Keywords

Tilapia; Streptococcus agalactiae; Serotypes; Genotypes

Funding

  1. Guangxi Scientific and Technological Developmental Program [1123006-4]
  2. Item of Guangxi Bagui Scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previously, we reported 10 PEGE types of 85 tilapia Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS), which shifted from Streptococcus iniae in China, by using PEGE method. Presently, larger and more representative tilapia GBS were isolated, for the first time in China, to characterize their serotypes and genetic diversities more precisely than had done before. 168 GBS strains were distributed in five provinces of China, in which Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan were the major ones, holding 36.9% (62/168), 37.5% (63/168) and 19.6% (33/168), respectively. Serotypes, Ia, lb and III, were observed in these strains and the most predominant one was la (95.2%), which mainly distributed in Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan. la initially occurred in 2009, it shoot up to 32.1% in 2010, but decreased to 16.1% in 2011 before went up to 45.2% in 2012. lb sporadically occurred during 2007-2011, III only occurred in 2012. 14 different PFGE types, including 4 new types (N, O, P and Q), were observed, in which B, D, F and G were the predominant types, holding 83.9% (141/168) of the total GBS strains. la corresponded to 11 PFGE types N-P), in which type D predominated (51%). lb represented 3 genotypes (I, J and Q) and III harbored only 2 genotypes (N and F). Type N and F synchronously presented in Ia and III. In summary, the genetic diversity of tilapia GBS varied by serotypes and changed with geographical locations and years. Although la still predominated, new rare serotype III already occurred in China. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available