4.7 Article

First detection of Schmallenberg virus RNA in bovine semen, Germany, 2012

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 3-4, Pages 289-295

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.09.002

Keywords

Schmallenberg virus; SBV; Cattle; Semen; Diagnostic; Germany

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and consumer protection
  2. European Union [2012/349/EU]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In analogy to the related Akabane virus, transmission of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) by contaminated semen has primarily been considered negligible. However, the potential economic consequences for stock-bull breeders prompted the investigation of reliable diagnostic methods for SBV-RNA detection in bovine semen. Twelve extraction methods were compared using a dilution series of SBV-spiked semen as well as serum and medium samples for control. The most promising methods were subsequently used with semen samples obtained in an intensive field study. In total, frozen semen from 95 SBVseroconverted bulls collected in the field between May and November 2012 were tested for SBV-RNA with an optimised standard operating procedure. The highest diagnostic and analytical sensitivity for the extraction of SBV in semen was found for the Trizole LS Reagent lysis with or without combined purification of the viral RNA with magnetic beads. A total of 29 of 766 semen batches from 11 of 95 SBV-infected bulls were PCR-positive (C-q-values 26-37). Intermittent virus excretion was observed in 2 of the bulls. SBV-RNApositive semen was coincidentally detected with early SBV-antibodies in 4 bulls. In bulls that showed seroconversion together with consecutive positive semen batches, SBV-RNA was predominantly found in the seminal cell fraction, while in bulls with single positive results only, SBV-RNA was detected exclusively in the seminal plasma. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available