4.7 Article

The role of accessory proteins in the replication of feline infectious peritonitis virus in peripheral blood monocytes

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 2-4, Pages 447-455

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.10.032

Keywords

Feline coronavirus; Recombinant deletion mutants of FIPV; Accessory proteins; Replication kinetics; Monocytes

Funding

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) [G.0284.09N]
  2. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen)
  3. Research Foundation-Flanders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to productively infect monocytes/macrophages is the most important difference between the low virulent feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) and the lethal feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV). In vitro, the replication of FECV in peripheral blood monocytes always drops after 12 h post inoculation, while FIPV sustains its replication in the monocytes from 45% of the cats. The accessory proteins of feline coronaviruses have been speculated to play a prominent role in virulence as deletions were found to be associated with attenuated viruses. Still, no functions have been ascribed to them. In order to investigate if the accessory proteins of FIPV are important for sustaining its replication in monocytes, replication kinetics were determined for FIPV 79-1146 and its deletion mutants, lacking either accessory protein open reading frame 3abc (FIPV-Delta 3), 7ab (FIPV-Delta 7) or both (FIPV-Delta 3 Delta 7). Results showed that the deletion mutants FIPV-Delta 7 and FIPV-Delta 3 Delta 7 could not maintain their replication, which was in sharp contrast to wt-FIPV. FIPV-Delta 3 could still sustain its replication, but the percentage of infected monocytes was always lower compared to wt-FIPV. In conclusion, this study showed that ORF7 is crucial for FIPV replication in monocytes/macrophages, giving an explanation for its importance in vivo, its role in the development of FIP and its conservation in field strains. The effect of an ORF3 deletion was less pronounced, indicating only a supportive role of ORF3 encoded proteins during the infection of the in vivo target cell by FIPVs. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available