4.7 Article

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) infection in wild boars

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 3-4, Pages 250-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.11.023

Keywords

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS); Epidemiology; Wild boars

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is one of the economically most important swine diseases worldwide. The virus can be spread by viraemic and persistent infected pigs. Spread and infection are advanced in areas with high herd and population densities. As wild boars have been found seropositive for PRRSV in Germany, France, and the USA, exchange between wild and domestic pig populations may exist. However, comprehensive information on PRRSV infection in wild boars is presently not available. The aim of the current study was thus, to systematically study PRRSV infection in wild boars to provide information on spatiotemporal, host and viral effects. The study was based on 531 wild boars from 52 hunts in Germany (2004-2007). PRRSV infection was determined and strains (US/EU) were classified by PCR. A total of 15.9% of the wild boars were PRRSV-positive (US: 14.2%; EU: 6.2%), with remarkable effects of state (US: 5.1-46.2%; EU: 0-17.6%), season (0-36.5%) and tissue (lungs: 89%: tonsils: 11%). Prevalences did neither correlate with age or weight, nor with density of production units, domestic pigs or wild boars. Open reading frame (ORF) 1-sequences within EU- and US-strains didnot differ among wild boar samples. Homologies between EU-samples/Lelystad-virus and US-samples/PRRSV-MLV virus were 99.3 and 97%, respectively. This is the first comprehensive evidence of PRRSV infection in wild boars. We conclude that there is only a weak relation between wild boar and domestic PRRSV infection. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available