4.7 Article

A longitudinal study of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli in two dairy goat herds

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 3-4, Pages 428-434

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.05.021

Keywords

Verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli; Dairy goats; Longitudinal study

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS G03-025-COLIRED-O157, PI052023, PI051428, REIPI RD06/0008/1018]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [PGIDIT05BTF26101P, PGIDIT065TAL26101P]
  3. Universidad Complutense-Comunidad de Madrid [CCG07-UCM/AGR-2568]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A longitudinal study wits conducted on two dairy farms to investigate the pattern of shedding of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) in goats. Faecal samples were taken from 20 goat kids once weekly during the first 4 weeks of life and then once every month for the next 5 months of life, and from 18 replacement animals and 15 adults once every month for 12 months. The proportion of samples containing VTEC was higher for replacement animals and adults (85.7% and 78.7%, respectively) than for goat kids (25.4%). About 90% of the VTEC colonies isolated from healthy goats belonged to five serogroups (O33, O76, O126, O146 and O166) but the most frequent serogroups of these isolates, except one. were different in the two herds studied. E. coli O157:H7 wits found in three Pat kids on only one occasion. None of the VTEC isolates, except the three E. coli O157:H7 isolates, was eae-positive. The patterns of shedding of VTEC in goat Kids were variable, but, in contrast, most of the replacement animals and adults were persistent VTEC shedders. Our results show that isolates of VTEC O33. 076, O126, O146 and O166 are adapted for colonising the intestine of goats but that, in contrast, infection with VTEC O157:H7 in goats seems to be transient. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available