4.4 Article

Evaluation of maxillary arterial blood flow in anesthetized cats with the mouth closed and open

Journal

VETERINARY JOURNAL
Volume 196, Issue 3, Pages 325-331

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.018

Keywords

Blindness; Deafness; Dynamic CT; Feline; Maxillary artery; Magnetic resonance angiography

Funding

  1. Bernice Barbour Foundation, Wellington, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mouth-gag is a common tool used in veterinary medicine during oral and transoral procedures in cats but its use has recently been associated with the development of blindness. The goal of this study was to investigate whether maximal opening of the mouth affects maxillary artery blood flow in six anesthetized cats. To assess blood flow, the electroretinogram (ERG), brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were evaluated qualitatively with the mouth closed and open. During dynamic computer tomography (CT) examinations, detection of contrast medium in the maxillary artery was quantified by measuring the Hounsfield units (HUs). The peak HU, time to peak and mean HU were determined. Changes >= 10% of these parameters were considered indicative of altered blood flow. ERG and BAER were normal with the mouth closed in all cats, but was abnormal with the mouth opened maximally in two cats and one cat, respectively. During MRA, blood flow was undetected in either maxillary artery in one cat and reduced in the right maxillary artery in two cats, when the mouth was open. During CT, the peak HU decreased >= 10% in three cats, the time to peak was >= 10% longer in two cats, and the mean HU was >= 10% lower in one cat when the mouth was open. No cat developed apparent blindness or deafness. Maximal opening of the mouth caused alterations in several indicators of blood flow in some individual cats. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available