4.4 Article

Direct contact transmission of three different foot-and-mouth disease virus strains in swine demonstrates important strain-specific differences

Journal

VETERINARY JOURNAL
Volume 193, Issue 2, Pages 456-463

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.01.012

Keywords

FMDV; Swine; Direct contact; Transmission; Pathogenesis

Funding

  1. Plum Island Animal Disease Center Research Participation Program fellowship
  2. Department of Homeland Security [60-1940-7-047]
  3. USDA ARS-CRIS [1940-32000-052-00D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel direct contact transmission model for the study of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) infection of swine was utilized to investigate transmission characteristics of three FMDV strains belonging to serotypes A, O and Asia1. Each strain demonstrated distinct transmission characteristics and required different exposure times to achieve successful contact transmission. While a 4 h exposure was sufficient for strain A24 Cruzeiro (A24Cru), both O1 Manisa and Asia1 Shamir transmission required 18 h or more. Viral excretion levels from donors (for all three strains) and virus present in room air (for A24Cru and O1 Manisa) were evaluated and associated with clinical signs and observed transmission pattern. Although all directly inoculated donor animals showed acute FMD, A24Cru had the highest levels of viral shedding in saliva and nasal swabs followed by O1 Manisa and Asia1 Shamir. Virus levels in room air were higher and were detected longer for A24Cru than for O1 Manisa. These results provide direct evidence for important strain-specific variation in transmission characteristics and emphasize the need for thorough evaluation of different FMDV viral strains using a well defined contact transmission methodology. This information is critical for vaccine and biotherapeutic efficacy testing, pathogenesis and disease modeling of FMDV transmission. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available