4.3 Article

Comparison of cancer stem cell antigen expression by tumor cell lines and by tumor biopsies from dogs with melanoma and osteosarcoma

Journal

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 3-4, Pages 132-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.07.006

Keywords

Flow cytometry; Cancer; Stem cells; Melanoma; Osteosarcoma

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [5K01OD010911-04]
  2. Office of Research Infrastructure Progarms/OD
  3. Merck-Merial Summer Research Program
  4. Colorado State University Supercluster fund
  5. Shipley Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a small subpopulation of tumor cells that play a critical role in initiating and sustaining tumor growth. However, we currently have an incomplete understanding of the expression patterns of CSC antigens in tumors of dogs, nor do we understand how expression of these antigens vary between tumor cell lines and tumor biopsy specimens. Therefore, we used flow cytometry and commonly reported CSC surface and intracellular markers to evaluate the phenotype and overall frequency of CSC subpopulations in tumor cell lines and primary tumor biopsy samples from dogs with melanoma and osteosarcoma. We found that cells expressing common CSC antigens were rare in tumor cell lines, with the exception of tumor cells expressing CD44 and CD90. In contrast, tumor cells expressing conventional CSC antigens such as CD133, CD34, CD44, CD24 and Oct3/4 were much more common in tumor biopsy samples. Notably, the frequency and types of putative CSC subpopulations were very similar in biopsy samples from dogs with either melanoma or osteosarcoma. Our results suggest that the tumor microenvironment significantly influences CSC subpopulations within tumors and that tumor cell lines may not accurately reflect the actual frequency or types of CSC subpopulations present in tumor tissues in vivo. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available