4.3 Article

Flow cytometric immune profiling of specific-pathogen-free chickens before and after infectious challenges

Journal

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 1-2, Pages 32-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.10.004

Keywords

Immunophenotyping; Chicken; SPF; Flow cytometry

Funding

  1. Capes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Broilers and layer chickens have been intensively selected for production parameters. This selection has affected immune capacity. Consequently, the fine-tuning of immune responses is becoming important for maximum productivity. Flow cytometry is a recurrent technology used for the immunophenotyping of birds. Studies, however, have focused on the mechanism of specific diseases or have used animals whose immunological condition could be biased-by vaccination or environmental stressors, for example. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune status of specific-pathogen-free birds across different age ranges to characterize the natural changes that occur over time. Additionally, specific-pathogen-free chickens were challenged with four infectious agents, allowing identification of the subpopulations of peripheral blood immune cells that are consistently altered under various conditions. Several lymphocyte subsets vary naturally with aging, so the interpretation of results using animals of different age ranges must proceed with care. Parameters such as CD8(+)CD28(-), CD8 alpha alpha(+), CD4(+)CD8(+), and CD8(+)TCRV beta 1(+) have been shown to be valuable in understanding immune changes during disease. The use of these data allows a determination of the consistency of cytometric parameters under various conditions, which should ease the interpretation of immunophenotyping and the future application of cytometric analysis in the poultry industry. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available