4.0 Article

Clinical Presentation, Long-Term Follow-Up, and Outcomes of 1001 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy Patients and Family Members

Journal

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR GENETICS
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 437-446

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.001003

Keywords

arrhythmias; cardiac; arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia-cardiomyopathy; arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia; cardiomyopathies; genetics

Funding

  1. Dr Francis P. Chiaramonte Private Foundation
  2. St. Jude Medical Inc
  3. Medtronic Inc.
  4. Leyla Erkan Family Fund for ARVD Research
  5. Dr Satish, Rupal, and Robin Shah ARVD Fund at Johns Hopkins
  6. Bogle Foundation
  7. Healing Hearts Foundation
  8. Campanella family
  9. Patrick J. Harrison Family
  10. Peter French Memorial Foundation
  11. Wilmerding Endowments
  12. Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands [06901]
  13. Netherlands Heart Foundation [2007B132, 2007B139, 2013T033]
  14. Netherlands CardioVascular Research Initiative: the Netherlands Heart Foundation
  15. Dutch Federation of University Medical Centers
  16. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
  17. Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is a progressive cardiomyopathy. We aimed to define long-term outcome in a transatlantic cohort of 1001 individuals. Methods and Results Clinical and genetic characteristics and follow-up data of ARVD/C index-patients (n=439, fulfilling of 2010 criteria in all) and family members (n=562) were assessed. Mutations were identified in 276 index-patients (63%). Index-patients presented predominantly with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (268; 61%). During a median follow-up of 7 years, 301 of the 416 index-patients presenting alive (72%) experienced sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death during follow-up occurred more frequently among index-patients without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (10/63, 16% versus 2/335, 0.6%). Overall, cardiac mortality and the need for cardiac transplantation were low (6% and 4%, respectively). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar in index-patients with and without mutations, as well as in those with familial and nonfamilial ARVD/C. ARVD/C was diagnosed in 207 family members (37%). Symptoms at first evaluation correlated with disease expression. Family members with mutations were more likely to meet Task Force Criteria for ARVD/C (40% versus 18%), experience sustained ventricular arrhythmias (11% versus 1%), and die from a cardiac cause (2% versus 0%) than family members without mutations. Conclusions Long-term outcome was favorable in diagnosed and treated ARVD/C index-patients and family members. Outcome in index-patients was modulated by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, but not by mutation status and familial background of disease. One third of family members developed ARVD/C. Outcome in family members was determined by symptoms at first evaluation and mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available