4.5 Article

Linear quadratic game and non-cooperative predictive methods for potential application to modelling driver-AFS interactive steering control

Journal

VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 165-198

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2012.715653

Keywords

driver; active front steering; linear quadratic game; non-cooperative model predictive control; Nash solution

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/K00915X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K00915X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper is concerned with the modelling of strategic interactions between the human driver and the vehicle active front steering (AFS) controller in a path-following task where the two controllers hold different target paths. The work is aimed at extending the use of mathematical models in representing driver steering behaviour in complicated driving situations. Two game theoretic approaches, namely linear quadratic game and non-cooperative model predictive control (non-cooperative MPC), are used for developing the driverAFS interactive steering control model. For each approach, the open-loop Nash steering control solution is derived; the influences of the path-following weights, preview and control horizons, driver time delay and arm neuromuscular system (NMS) dynamics are investigated, and the CPU time consumed is recorded. It is found that the two approaches give identical time histories as well as control gains, while the non-cooperative MPC method uses much less CPU time. Specifically, it is observed that the introduction of weight on the integral of vehicle lateral displacement error helps to eliminate the steady-state path-following error; the increase in preview horizon and NMS natural frequency and the decline in time delay and NMS damping ratio improve the path-following accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available