4.2 Article

Prevalence and Genotype of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Cattle from Jilin Province, Northeastern China

Journal

VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 399-402

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1516

Keywords

Toxoplasma gondii; Cattle; Prevalence; Genotype; Jilin Province

Funding

  1. Chinese National Nature Science Foundation [31372430, 31072127, 31001057]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest in China [201303042]
  3. Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development [2011AA10A215]
  4. Chinese National Key Technology RD Program [2010BAD04B01]
  5. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB722501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence and genotype of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cattle in Jilin Province, northeastern China was investigated. A total of 1040 serum samples were collected from eight administrative regions from September to October, 2011, and antibodies to T. gondii were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results showed that the overall seroprevalence of T. gondii in cattle was 12.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-14.8%), with a higher prevalence of 22.2% (95% CI 13.6-30.8%) in Siping. Sixty-six tissue samples were collected from Changchun, and T. gondii DNA was detected by a nested PCR. There were nine (13.6%; 95% CI 5.4-21.9%) positive samples, which were genotyped using 11 genetic markers for PCR restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP). Only one sample could be completely genotyped, and all of the loci were grouped into clonal type I, except for type III at the GRA6 locus, implying that T. gondii in cattle in Changchun, Jilin Province was type I variant. This study is the first report on genotype of T. gondii infection in cattle in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available