4.5 Article

Celecoxib modulates nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury and rat aorta model of hypoxia/reoxygenation

Journal

VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 24-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2014.04.004

Keywords

Ischemia/reperfusion; Hypoxia/reoxygenation; Celexocib; Nitric oxide; Reactive oxygen species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study investigated the interaction between COX-2, NO and ROS after ischemia/reperfusion events in the kidney and vascular beds. Materials and methods: Kidney IRI model in male Sprague-Dawley rats was used and various biochemical and histopathological parameters were examined. The isolated rat aortic rings served as model for hypoxia/reoxygenation. Results: Celecoxib reduced serum creatinine and urea and kidney malonaldehyde levels, increased kidney superoxide dismutase activity and reduced glutathione level and histopathological scores at 24 and 48 h after reperfusion compared to IRI group. This was associated with a significant increase in NO level to 0.70 +/- 0.03 nmol/mg protein compared to 037 +/- 0.01 nmol/mg protein for IRI group. Unexpectedly, celecoxib reduced COX-2 expression in the kidney. Celecoxib reversed the effect of hypoxia-reoxygenation on ACh and SNP-induced relaxation in aortic rings but failed to potentiate the SNP relaxations in the control rings. Hypoxia-reoxygenation significantly impaired celecoxib's relaxation of aorta (12.69 +/- 2.69% vs. 35.84 +/- 0.84%) which was significantly inhibited in presence of L-NAME. Conclusions: Celecoxib beneficially affects the outcome of renal IRI by lowering the expression of COX-2 and hence reducing oxidative stress and increasing the bioavailability of NO. Direct interaction between celecoxib and NO in associated vascular beds may also be a contributing mechanism. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available