4.4 Article

Prevalence of hypoechoic carotid plaques in coronary artery disease: relationship with coexistent peripheral arterial disease and leukocyte number

Journal

VASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 13-19

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1358863X08097066

Keywords

carotid artery disease; coronary artery disease; hypoechoic carotid plaques; inflammation; peripheral arterial disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In coronary artery disease (CAD), a concomitant peripheral arterial disease (PAD) entails a more severe coronary atherosclerosis. We hypothesized that the severity of carotid artery disease is greater in CAD+PAD than in CAD alone. In 90 CAD and 79 CAD+PAD patients, carotid plaque echolucency was measured by gray-scale median (GSM), and the degree of carotid stenosis by routine Doppler criteria. Plaques were absent in 20 (22.2%) CAD and 8 (10.1%) CAD+PAD patients (p = 0.035), while the prevalence of carotid stenosis = 50% was 16.7% and 25.3%, respectively (p = 0.166). The GSM score was 45.1 [21.7-67.7] in CAD+PAD vs 60.1 [44.9-83.1] in CAD alone (p < 0.001). Consistently, hypoechoic plaques (GSM < 25th percentile) were more common in CAD+PAD than in CAD patients (38.0% vs 11.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, CAD+ PAD was the only variable significantly associated with hypoechoic plaques (OR = 4.16, 95% CI 1.68-10.28). However, when the leukocyte count was added to the model, it showed the strongest association with hypoechoic plaques (OR = 6.70, 95% CI 2.13-21.10). In conclusion, compared with CAD alone patients, those with concomitant PAD showed a greater prevalence of plaques with characteristics of instability. Thus, our data suggest that in CAD+ PAD, evaluation of carotid plaque echogenicity could contribute to improve clinical decision-making and differentiate treatments for individual patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available