4.2 Article

Patient-reported symptoms are independent of disease severity in patients with primary varicose veins

Journal

VASCULAR
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 262-268

Publisher

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/vasc.2011.oa0303

Keywords

varicose veins; chronic venous insufficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this paper is to explore patterns of incompetence and disease distribution in patients with chronic venous disorders and to correlate this with CEAP (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic and Pathologic) classification and presenting symptoms to determine which features of chronic venous disorder (CVD) could be used to guide a patient pathway for referral and treatment. Consecutive patients attending a one-stop venous clinic at a university teaching hospital were recruited over a 12-month period. Patients were clinically assessed, assigned CEAP scores, duplex-scanned and categorized. Data were analyzed to identify associations between symptomatology and disease. Four hundred twenty-four limbs were divided into groups A (C2-3) (339) and B (C4-6) (85). The number of men, mean patient age, varicose vein diameter and quality-of-life score (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire - AVVS) were significantly higher in group B (P<0.01). Ache occurred more commonly in group A and in women (P<0.01). Ache and pain were seen more frequently with saphenofemoral junction reflux (P<0.05). Group A women were more likely to be offered surgical intervention while men were managed conservatively (P<0.05). In conclusion, CVD symptoms are independent of disease severity assessed by CEAP score. Advanced disease is associated with larger venous diameters, older age and corresponds to a poorer quality of life. Objective markers such as CEAP, Venous Clinical Severity Score and AVVS should be used in determining a patient pathway for referral and treatment of CVD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available