4.3 Article

Differential fruitset between grapevine cultivars is related to differences in pollen viability and amine concentration in flowers

Journal

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 149-158

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajgw.12191

Keywords

grapevines; phenylethylamine; pollen tube; polyamines; reproductive performance

Funding

  1. Australia's grapegrowers and winemakers through their investment body, Wine Australia
  2. Australian Research Council [FT130100709/CE140100008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and AimsReproductive capacity among grapevine cultivars varies considerably and impacts yield. Bioactive amines are reported to be involved in many aspects of plant reproductive physiology. We aimed to examine the association between the reproductive performance of cultivars and the concentration of amines in the reproductive organs. Methods and ResultsThe reproductive performance of Shiraz, Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon was assessed by determining fruitset, coulure index, millerandage index, pollen tube growth and stigma receptivity. Endogenous concentration of amines in flowers and berries was measured. Poor reproductive performance exhibited by Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot compared with that of Shiraz was correlated with poor pollen viability. Amine profiles in the flowers and berries varied significantly among cultivars. A significantly higher concentration of diaminopropane was found in Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon and correlated with a higher proportion of underdeveloped berries. An aromatic amine phenylethylamine was found to be the major free amine in the flowers of Merlot, a cultivar susceptible to poor fruitset. ConclusionVariable reproductive performance exhibited by grapevine cultivars is related to differences in pollen viability and amine concentration in the reproductive organs. Significance of the StudyA better understanding of the association between reproductive performance and amines in the reproductive organs of grapevines has been achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available