4.5 Article

Comparison of snowmelt infiltration under different soil-freezing conditions influenced by snow cover

Journal

VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 79-86

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0089

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The depth of soil frost is decreasing in cold regions around the world as a result of climate warming. To evaluate the potential impacts of the reduction in frost depth on the hydrologic cycle, it is necessary to understand snowmelt in filtration processes in frozen soils. A field study was conducted at an agricultural site characterized by volcanic ash soil in Tokachi, Hokkaido, Japan, where frost depths have decreased significantly in the last 20 yr. Soil temperature, water content, matric potential, snow cover, and meteorological parameters were monitored to quantify snowmelt in filtration flux for four winters that had different snow and soil conditions. When snowmelt began, the soil frost was 0.1 to 0.2 m thick in two winters and was absent in two other winters, providing a unique opportunity to compare snowmelt in filtration under frozen and unfrozen conditions. Most of the snowmelt water in filtrated into the soil under both frozen and unfrozen conditions, indicating that the frozen soil layer did not impede in filtration. The lack of flow impedance in the frozen soil was partly due to relatively high air temperature and an absence of freeze-back events during the snowmelt period. Furthermore, the temperature of the frozen soil layer was close to 0 degrees C when the melt started, meaning that very little meltwater refroze in the soil before the temperature reached 0 degrees C. The thick (> 1 m) snow cover insulated the soil surface, allowing the frozen soil layer to warm up with the upward conduction of heat from the unfrozen layer below. These results indicate the importance of the interaction between snow cover and soil, which can be significantly affected by climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available