4.6 Review

On the factors affecting the critical indenter penetration for measurement of coating hardness

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages 911-920

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.007

Keywords

Finite element simulation; Nanoindentation; Coated systems; Hardness

Funding

  1. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C006852/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nanoindentation test is the only viable approach to assess the properties of very thin coatings (< 1 mu m) since it can operate at the required scale and provides a fingerprint of the indentation response or the coating/substrate system. To measure the hardness of the coating only it is traditionally assumed that, as a rule-of-thumb, when the relative indentation depth (RID, i.e. the penetration divided by the coating thickness) is less than 0.1, the substrate will not affect the measured hardness of the coating. However, it is found that this rule is too strict for some and too loose for other coated systems. In this paper we present a comprehensive investigation of the factors influencing the critical relative indentation depth (CRID) using finite element simulation. The CRID is very sensitive to tip radius for soft coatings oil hard substrates. For most coating/substrate combinations at reasonable penetration depths the 0.1 rule-of-thumb is a safe estimate. It is shown that the elastic property mismatch between coating and substrate also has an important effect on the measured hardness and this means that the Oliver and Pharr method generally used to extract hardness from nanoindentation data may give inaccurate results in coating/substrate systems with significant elastic mismatch. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available