Journal
VACCINE
Volume 32, Issue 33, Pages 4214-4219Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.046
Keywords
Vaccination; Meningococcal; Meningococcal B vaccine; Family physicians; Attitudes; Public health; Equity
Categories
Funding
- National Health and Medical Research Council [1016272]
- General Practice Education and Training (GPET) grant [026/12]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: To determine factors influencing Family Physician (FP) uptake of non government-funded vaccines, and to explore FP attitudes towards the introduction and use of a new vaccine to protect against serogroup B meningococcal disease to inform its future introduction into the Australian Immunisation Schedule. Design setting and participants: Quantitative, self-administered state-wide questionnaire mailed to all FPs in South Australia (n = 1786). Results from 523 FP respondents in South Australia, collected between June and October 2013. Main outcome measures: Self-reported immunisation counselling practices; and knowledge, attitudes and barriers to prescribing of Meningococcal B (Men B) vaccine and other recommended, non-funded immunisations. Results: The response rate was 30% (n = 523). While most (59%) respondents had worked in general practice for over 20 years, only 39% of all respondents had ever had personal or professional experience with a case of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Most FPs (63%) were aware that a meningococcal B vaccine was being developed, and 93% of respondents agreed that this vaccine should be government-funded. FPs ranked Men B vaccine as the highest priority to receive funding of eight currently non-funded immunisation strategies. High vaccine cost and low patient socioeconomic status were identified as definite barriers to prescribing non-funded vaccines by 59% of respondents. Past IMD experience significantly affected attitudes and prescribing practices. Conclusions: IMD, while encountered rarely in clinical practice, is considered an important disease to vaccinate against by FPs. Cost and perceived low socioeconomic status of patients are substantial barriers to FPs prescribing Men B and other non-funded vaccines, and inclusion of such vaccines on the National Immunisation Program is likely to improve equity of access. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available