4.5 Article

CD8 T cell independent immunity after single dose infection-treatment-vaccination (ITV) against Plasmodium yoelii

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 483-491

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.058

Keywords

Plasmodium infections; CD8 T cells; Vaccination; Antibodies; Subpatent infection

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI85515, AI95178, AI100527, AI099070]
  2. [T32AI007551]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sporozoite vaccination of both humans and rodents elicits potent anti-malarial immunity, but the dose of sporozoites and the number of immunizations required varies with vaccination approach. Here we examine the immunological basis for superior protection afforded from single-dose vaccination with virulent sporozoites administered under prophylatic chloroquine-cover, referred to as infection-treatment-vaccination (ITV), compared to the well-studied approach of administering radiation-attenuated Plasmodium sporozoites (RAS). Earlier rodent studies utilizing ITV and RAS vaccination suggested a major role of CD8 T cells in reducing liver parasite burden after sporozoite challenge in a BALB/c mouse model. Consistent with this, we find that in C57Bl/6 mice ITV elicits substantially higher parasite-specific CD8 T cell responses than RAS vaccination and enhances immunity against P. yoelii infection. However, we show ITV-induced CD8 T cells are not necessary for protection following liver-stage sporozoite or blood-stage parasite challenge. Mechanistically, we found protection afforded from single-dose ITV is associated with low grade, transient parasitemia shortly following cessation of chloroquine treatment and generation of potent antibody responses to blood-stage parasites. Collectively, our data show the mechanistic basis for enhanced protective immunity against P. yoelli elicited by ITV in highly susceptible C57Bl/6 mice is independent of CD8 T cells. These studies may be relevant in understanding the potent immunity observed with ITV in humans. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available