4.5 Article

Safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant BCG vaccine VPM1002 in a phase 1 open-label randomized clinical trial

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 1340-1348

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.053

Keywords

Tuberculosis; Clinical trial; Vaccination; Safety; Immune response; BCG

Funding

  1. European Union [Health-F3-2009-241745, FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2008-228403]
  2. German Ministry for Science and Education [01KI0210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Current vaccination using Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), fails to prevent pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). New vaccination strategies are essential for reducing the global incidence of TB. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of VPM1002, a recombinant BCG vaccine candidate. EudraCT (2007-002789-37) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00749034). Methods: Healthy volunteers were enrolled in a phase 1 open-label, dose escalation randomized clinical trial, and received one intradermal dose of VPM1002 (Mycobacterium bovis BCG Delta ureC::hly Hm(R)) or BCG. Immunogenicity was assessed by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production, cellular immune response markers by flow cytometry and serum antibodies against mycobacterial antigens. Results: Eighty volunteers were randomized into two groups according to previous BCG vaccination and mycobacterial exposure (BCG-naive, n=40 and BCG-immune, n = 40). In each group, 30 individuals were vaccinated with VPM1002 (randomized to three escalating doses) and 10 with BCG. VPM1002 was safe and stimulated IFN-gamma-producing and multifunctional T cells, as well as antibody-producing B cells in BCG-naive and BCG-immune individuals. Conclusions: VPM1002 was safe and immunogenic for B-cell and T-cell responses and hence will be brought forward through the clinical trial pipeline. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available