4.5 Review

Outer membrane protein A (OmpA) from Shigella flexneri 2a: A promising subunit vaccine candidate

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 31, Issue 36, Pages 3644-3650

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.100

Keywords

Outer membrane protein A; Toll-like receptors; Macrophages; CD4+T cells; Shigella flexneri 2a; Vaccine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shigellosis is the leading cause of childhood mortality and morbidity. Despite many years of extensive research a practical vaccine is not yet available against the disease. Recent studies illustrate that bacterial outer membrane proteins are budding target as vaccine antigen. Outer membrane proteins A (OmpA) are among the most immunodominant antigens in the outer membrane of gram negative bacteria and possess many characteristics desired of a vaccine candidate. We observe that OmpA of Shigella flexneri 2a is crossreactive and common antigen among Shigella spp. and the epitope is widely exposed on the cell surface as well as capable of evoking protective immunity in mice. The protective immunity involves participation of both the humoral and cellular immune responses, since OmpA boosts rapid induction of IgG and IgA in both the systemic and mucosal compartments and also activates Th1 cells. The immunopotentiating activity of OmpA is mediated by its ability to bind and stimulate macrophages and up-regulate the surface expression of MHCII, CD80 and CD40, leading to activation of CD4(+) T cells to secrete cytokines and express chemokine receptor and IL-12R beta 2, thereby orchestrating the bridge between innate and adaptive immune responses. This ability is dependent on Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), as demonstrated by lack of response by TLR2 knockdown macrophages to OmpA. Hence this property of OmpA to link innate and adaptive immunity via TLR2 offers a novel vista to develop vaccine against shigellosis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available