4.5 Article

Assessment of the sevenband grouper Epinephelus septemfasciatus with a live nervous necrosis virus (NNV) vaccine at natural seawater temperature

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 31, Issue 16, Pages 2025-2027

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.049

Keywords

Kinetics; Live vaccine; Viral nervous necrosis; NNV; Grouper; Fish rearing temperature

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Korean Government (MEST) [2011-0029000]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0029000] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21380112] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the long-term kinetics of nervous necrosis virus (NNV) infectivity in sevenband grouper, Epinephelus septemfasciatus, injected with a live NNV vaccine at 17.3 degrees C and reared at natural seawater temperature. We also evaluated horizontal infection of NNV from fish vaccinated with live NNV to naive fish in a cohabitation experiment. Although 10.5% mortality was observed in the vaccinated fish, they were strongly protected from the challenge with homologous NNV. The NNV infectivity titer was detected from day 5 after vaccination, peaked on day 10 at 10(7.43 +/- 0.35) TCID50/g, but NNV was under the detection limit (<= 10(2.8) TCID50/g) between days 42 and 128. No mortalities or NNV were detected in any of the vaccinated and cohabitated naive fish, suggesting that NNV spread from fish vaccinated with live NNV should be low if it is limited to fish in the late stage of vaccination (>= 42 days from NNV inoculation). The present results demonstrate that a protective immune response to NNV was mounted in sevenband grouper by the live NNV vaccine without controlling fish rearing temperature. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available