4.5 Article

A computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA) based H5N1 VLP vaccine elicits broadly reactive antibodies in mice and ferrets

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 29, Issue 16, Pages 3043-3054

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.100

Keywords

H5N1; Vaccine; Influenza; Consensus; Virus-like particles

Funding

  1. NIH [T32AI060525]
  2. NIH/NIAID [U01AI077771]
  3. Center for Vaccine Research
  4. PATH Vaccine Solutions
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pandemic outbreaks of influenza are caused by the emergence of a pathogenic and transmissible virus to which the human population is immunologically naive. Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) of the H5N1 subtype are of particular concern because of the high mortality rate (60% case fatality rate) and novel subtype. In order to develop a vaccine that elicits broadly reactive antibody responses against emerging H5N1 isolates, we utilized a novel antigen design technique termed computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA). The COBRA HA sequence was based upon HA amino acid sequences from clade 2 H5N1 human infections and the expressed protein retained the ability to bind the receptor, as well as mediate particle fusion. Non-infectious recombinant VLP vaccines using the COBRA HA were purified from a mammalian expression system. Mice and ferrets vaccinated with COBRA HA H5N1 VLPs had protective levels of HAI antibodies to a representative isolates from each sub-clade of clade 2. Furthermore, VLP vaccinated animals were completely protected from a lethal challenge of the clade 2.2 H5N1 virus A/Whooper Swan/Mongolia/244/2005. This is the first report describing the use of COBRA-based antigen design. The COBRA HA H5N1 VLP vaccine elicited broadly reactive antibodies and is an effective influenza vaccine against HPAI virus. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available