4.5 Article

IsdA and IsdB antibodies protect mice against Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation and lethal challenge

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 28, Issue 38, Pages 6382-6392

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.097

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; IsdA; IsdB; Vaccine; Heme-iron-transport

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Infectious Diseases Branch [AI52474]
  2. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics (Siena, Italy)
  3. Region V Great Lakes Regional Center of Excellence in Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Consortium (GLRCE) [1-U54-AI-057153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequent cause of bacteremia and hospital-acquired infection, however a vaccine that prevents staphylococcal disease is currently not available. Two sortase-anchored surface proteins, IsdA and IsdB, have been identified as subunit vaccines that, following active immunization, protect experimental animals against intravenous challenge with staphylococci. Here we investigate the molecular basis of this immunity and report that, when passively transferred to naive mice, purified antibodies directed against IsdA or IsdB protected against staphylococcal abscess formation and lethal intravenous challenge. When added to mouse blood, IsdA- or IsdB-specific antibodies did not promote rapid opsonophagocytic killing of wild-type staphylococci. Antibodies directed against IsdA interfered with heme-binding and IsdB antibodies perturbed the ability of this surface protein to bind hemoglobin. As the structural genes for isdA and isdB are required for heme-iron scavenging during the pathogenesis of infection, we hypothesize that IsdA and IsdB antibodies may at least in part provide protection against staphylococci by interfering with the pathogen's heme-iron scavenging mechanisms. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available