4.5 Article

Immunogenic properties of RSV-B1 fusion (F) protein gene-encoding recombinant adenoviruses

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 27, Issue 40, Pages 5460-5471

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.004

Keywords

Respiratory syncytia virus; Fusion protein; Adenoviruses

Funding

  1. National Health Research Institute [VC-97PP04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two recombinant adenoviruses designated rAd-F0 Delta TM and rAd-F0 carrying the transmembrane truncated and full length of the F gene of the RSV-B1 strain, respectively, were engineered. Comparative immunogenicity studies in BALB/c mice showed that each vector was capable of inducing RSV-B1-specific antibodies that cross-reacted with the RSV-long and RSV-A2 viruses. The anti-RSV-B1 antibodies were neutralizing, and exhibited strong cross-neutralizing activity against the RSV-long and RSV-A2 isolates as well. Analysis of the cellular responses revealed that animals immunized with rAd-F0 Delta TM and rAd-F0 elicited CD4(+) T-cell responses of the Th1 and Th2 phenotypes, as well as F protein-specific CTLs. Production of Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13) by splenocytes of the rAd-F0 Delta TM and rAd-F0 immunized mice was markedly lower than those released by animals administered with heat-inactivated RSV-B1 (HIRSV-B1). Comparison of the overall humoral and cellular responses suggests that rAd-F0 Delta TM is significantly more immunogenic than rAd-F0. The anti-viral immunity generated by both recombinant adenovirus vectors has conferred protection against live RSV-B1 challenge as judged by the lower viral load recovered in the lungs, a faster rate of recovery of body weight loss, and a lower count of eosinophils as compared to eosinophilia in mice immunized with HIRSV-B1. Results from these studies suggest that rAd-F0 Delta TM or rAd-F0 possess immunogenic properties that meet the requirements expected from potential RSV vaccine candidates. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available