4.2 Article

Spatial and temporal use of roads by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta

Journal

URSUS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 43-56

Publisher

INT ASSOC BEAR RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT-IBA
DOI: 10.2192/09GR010.1

Keywords

Alberta; bootstrap; conditional logistic regression; contingency tables; crossing index; Fisher's exact test; grizzly bear; roads; Ursus arctos

Categories

Funding

  1. Foothills Research Institute
  2. Ainsworth Lumber
  3. Alberta Conservation Association (ACA)
  4. Alberta Energy Company
  5. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development
  6. Alberta Newsprint
  7. Anderson Resource Ltd.
  8. Avid Identification Systems Inc Canada
  9. Blue Ridge Lumber (1981 Ltd.)
  10. British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission Environmental Fund
  11. British Petroleum Canada Energy Company
  12. Burlington Resources
  13. Canada Centre for Remote Sensing
  14. Canada Resources Ltd.
  15. Canadian Forest Products
  16. Canadian Hunter
  17. Canadian Wildlife Service
  18. Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
  19. GeoAnalytic Ltd.
  20. Gregg River Resources
  21. Inland Cement
  22. Luscar Sterco (1977) Ltd.
  23. Millar Western Pulp Ltd.
  24. Mountain Equipment Co-op
  25. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  26. Parks Canada
  27. Petro-Canada
  28. PTAC (Petroleum Technology Alliance of Canada)
  29. Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
  30. Suncor
  31. Sundance Forest Industries
  32. Sunpine Forest Products Ltd.
  33. Telemetry Solutions
  34. Center for Wildlife Conservation (USA)
  35. Trans Canada Pipeline
  36. University of Alberta
  37. University of Calgary
  38. University of Saskatchewan
  39. University of Washington
  40. West Fraser Timber Company Limited
  41. Western College of Veterinary Medicine
  42. Weyerhaeuser of Canada Ltd.
  43. World Wildlife Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resource extraction activities in Alberta, Canada, have produced a large increase in the number of roads in grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) habitat. High road densities have been associated with high grizzly bear mortality rates in some areas. We used GPS data from grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada, 1999-2005 to examine (1) frequencies at which grizzly bears crossed roads (standardized by number of locations/bear and length of road segments), using a crossing index analysis among age sex classes, traffic volumes, seasons, and time of day; (2) habitat attributes surrounding crossing locations, using a resource selection function analysis to discern if certain habitats and road types were associated with crossing areas; and (3) grizzly bear distribution near roads as a function of age sex class and season to determine if bears were near roads more or less frequently than expected. Females had higher crossing indices than males for all seasons and daylight hours. Crossings occurred most often at narrow, unpaved roads near creeks and in open areas with high greenness scores. In spring, females with cubs were within 200 m of roads more frequently than expected. In autumn, subadult females were within 200 m of roads more frequently than expected, whereas adult males displayed the reverse pattern. These results indicate that females had a greater chance of encountering humans. Reducing the density of roads in grizzly bear habitat or reducing human presence on these roads, especially during the spring and fall seasons, may reduce the human-caused mortality to female grizzly bears. Creating or leaving a dense tree buffer along roads that traverse open habitats could provide a visual shield from passing vehicles, which may reduce grizzly bear human encounters and human-caused mortalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available