Initial Experience of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Therapeutic Response to Induction Chemoradiotherapy Against Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

OBJECTIVES To investigate the feasibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in predicting therapeutic response to low-dose chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) against muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Accurate assessment of response to induction therapy is an essential part of bladder-sparing therapeutic protocols against MIBC. However, conventional imaging studies are not useful in evaluating therapeutic response because of their inability to distinguish residual cancer from changes secondary to the treatment. METHODS Twenty patients with clinical T2-4aN0M0 bladder urothelial carcinoma (T2/T3/T4a: n = 10/8/2) who underwent induction LCRT comprising external beam radiotherapy to the bladder (40 Gy) concomitant with 2 cycles of cisplatin administration (20 mg/d for 5 days) followed by partial (n = 13) or radical cystectomy (n = 7) were prospectively enrolled. The patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging examinations with T2-weighted imaging (T2W), dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (DCE), and DWI after LCRT. A finding of each protocol was compared with a pathologic finding of cystectomy specimen. RESULTS Pathologic examination of cystectomy specimens revealed pathologic complete response in 13 (65%) of the 20 patients. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of T2W, DCE, and DWI in predicting pathologic response was 43/45/44%, 57/18/33%, and 57/92/80%, respectively. Despite comparable sensitivity, DWI was significantly superior in specificity and accuracy to T2W (P = .03 and .02, respectively) and DCE (P = .002 for both). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to show the feasibility of DWI over T2W and DCE for assessing therapeutic response to induction chemoradiotherapy against MIBC. The high specificity of DWI indicates that DWI is useful to accurately predict pathologic complete response, allowing more optimal patient selection in bladder-sparing protocols. UROLOGY 75: 387-392, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.