4.4 Article

Urologic disease burden in the United States: Veteran users of Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 37-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.163

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [N01 DK012460] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES To determine the disease burden, measured by resource utilization, of four Urologic conditions among veteran users of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare services and to assess variations by selected sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS We applied expert-derived diagnosis clusters to establish four patient cohorts from a population of U.S. veterans aged 18 years and older with at least one Outpatient visit in a VA healthcare facility in fiscal year 2001 (n = 3,691,519): (1) benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS), (2) kidney stones (KS), (3) urinary tract infections (UTI), and (4) urinary incontinence (UI). We identified patients with qualifying diagnosis codes associated with Outpatient visits in the national VA Outpatient Clinic file, thereby generating case Counts for each diagnostic category. RESULTS Among veteran users of VA healthcare services, when defined as the primary reason for the visit, the prevalence of BPH/LUTS was 4811 per 100,000 veterans (4.8%); the prevalence of KS was 597 per 100,000 (0.6%); the prevalence of UTI was 4265 and 1719 per 100,000 female and male veterans, respectively (4.3%) and 1.7%); and the prevalence of UI was 2161 and 515 per 100,000 female and male veterans, respectively (2.2% and 0.5%). Prevalence of these conditions when ascertained by capturing diagnoses appearing as secondary reasons for a physician visit was much higher. CONCLUSIONS Although we expected the prevalence of urologic conditions to be high among veterans who use the VA system for care, We found the burden Of Urologic disease among veterans to be comparable to other national data sets. Prevalence estimates based on primary diagnosis, rather than secondary or any diagnosis, significantly underestimated the disease burden among veterans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available