4.4 Article

Prostatic acid phosphatase adversely affects cause-specific survival in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer treated with Brachytherapy

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 146-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.024

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES To perform a retrospective analysis to assess the utility of pretreatment serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) as a predictor of cause-specific survival (CSS) in patients with higher risk prostate cancer treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103) brachytherapy and supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS From 1992 to 1996, 193 patients with clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma, a pretreatment PAP level, and Gleason score 7 or more, and/or a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Level of. 10 ng/mL or more were treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy and supplemental EBRT. The patients underwent EBRT of 41.4 Gy to a limited pelvic field and Pd-103 brachytherapy with a prescribed minimum Pd-103 dose of 80 Gy. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the predictive value of PAP, PSA, and Gleason score on CSS. RESULTS The 10-year CSS rate for patients with a PAP level of less than 1.5, 1.5 to 2.4, and 2.5 U/L or more was 93%, 87%, and 75%, respectively (P = 0.013). The 10-year CSS rate for patients with a PSA level of less than 10, 10 to 20, and greater than 20 ng/mL was 92%, 76%, and 83%, respectively (P = 0.393). The 10-year CSS rate for patients with a Gleason score of 6, 7, 8, and 9 was 90%, 89%, 70%, and 68%, respectively (P = 0.002). On Cox multivariate regression analysis, PAP (hazard ratio 1.31, P <0.0001) and Gleason score (hazard ratio 2.37, P = 0.0007) were associated with CSS. PSA was not predictive of CSS (P = 0.393). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrated that PAP is a stronger predictor of CSS than PSA or Gleason score in men with higher risk prostate cancer treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy and EBRT. Given the findings of this analysis, the use of PAP should be reconsidered in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available