4.1 Article

Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Rule-In and Rule-Out Clinically Important Prostate Cancer in Men at Risk: A Cohort Study

Journal

UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 49-53

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000325880

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate biopsy; Negative predictive value; Positive predictive value; Likelihood ratio

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council, Pelican Cancer Foundation, Prostate UK
  2. St Peter's Trust
  3. Prostate Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Prostate Cancer Research Centre
  5. UCL/UCLH NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  6. GSK
  7. USHIFU/Focused Surgery/Misonix Inc.
  8. Medical Research Council [G0701302, G1002509] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [09/22/67] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [G0701302, G1002509] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Overdiagnosis is arguably the greatest challenge in the management of men with prostate cancer. Multi-parametric (mp)-MRI prior to prostate biopsy may have a role in ruling-in and ruling-out clinically significant disease. Patients and Methods: 114 consecutive men at risk of prostate cancer with previous biopsy underwent mp-MRI prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies. Standard systematic biopsies were carried out with targeting to suspicious areas. Results: 59.6% had cancer detected by TRUS-guided biopsy. Mean age was 63.6 years (SD 9.0). If men had not been biopsied because of a negative mp-MRI, 21% (24/114) with no cancer and 5% (6/114) with clinically insignificant cancer could have avoided a biopsy. However, 4% (4/114) would have been advised to defer a biopsy that demonstrated the presence of clinically significant cancer. Conclusion: mp-MRI may have a role in ruling-in and ruling-out clinically significant prostate cancer in men at risk prior to biopsy. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available