4.7 Article

How many people should be in the urban forest? A comparison of trail preferences of Vienna and Sapporo forest visitor segments

Journal

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 215-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.002

Keywords

Crowding; Social stimulation; Stated choice; Trail use; Urban forest

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [18158-G05]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differences in trail preferences for social conditions of visitors to forests in Vienna and Sapporo were investigated in 2006 using a standardised image-based stated choice approach. On-site visitors to two comparable pen-urban forests - the Lobau Forest in Vienna, Austria (n = 373), and the Nopporo Forest in Sapporo, Japan (n = 256) - evaluated the same sets of computer manipulated images depicting 128 trail scenarios with different levels of social stimulation. Latent class segmentations, in three sub-segments of similar sizes, differentiated by partly opposite preferences for social conditions, were derived for both samples. A positive contribution of social stimulation to preferences was found for about 17% of Nopporo and 9% of Lobau respondents, while for close to 50% of Lobau respondents and 38% of Nopporo respondents very low levels of social stimulation were preferred. The results indicate that urban forests should be managed for users with a desire for low social densities as well as a denser social setting providing some levels of social stimulation. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available