4.6 Article

Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 13: more harm than good?

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 112-114

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.13388

Keywords

iatrogenic miscarriage; NIPT; Patau syndrome; test characteristics; trisomy 13

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 35-year-old primigravida, pregnant after in-vitro fertilization, was seen because of a trisomy 13/trisomy 18 (T13/T18) risk of 1: 55, based on the result of her first-trimester combined test. She elected for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at 14+5 weeks' gestation, which was positive for T13. After counseling, the patient elected to undergo amniocentesis. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) showed no signs of trisomy, and full karyotyping confirmed a normal 46, XY result. Analysis of the published literature on NIPT for T13 gives an overall detection rate of 91.6%, with a false-positive rate of 0.097%. Based on this detection rate, hypothetical calculations show that the positive predictive value is highly dependent on the prevalence of the disease, resulting in an unfavorable balance between benefit and harm in a general population. Copyright (C) 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available