4.5 Article

SBOTE STUDY: EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE THERAPY VERSUS ELECTRICAL STIMULATION AFTER BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A INJECTION FOR POST-STROKE SPASTICITY-A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 283-291

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.09.019

Keywords

Spasticity; Botulinum toxin type A; Electrical stimulation; Extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research is on-going to identify new methods of biostimulation to increase the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in the treatment of spasticity. The Spasticity treated by Botulinum Toxin and ESWT (SBOTE) study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) given immediately after BTX-A injections compared with electrical stimulation (ES) given immediately after BTX-A therapy for the management of focal upper limb spasticity in stroke patients. ES was given for 30 min twice a day for 5 days starting at 5 Hz; ESWT was given once a day for 5 days. At study follow-up, patients treated with BTX-A injections and ESWT showed a statistically greater significance and continuous decrease of spasticity measure (modified Ashworth scale [MAS]: 1.37, 1.75 and 1.58 at 15, 30 and 90 days post-treatment, respectively), of spasms (spasm frequency scale [SFS]: 0.8 and 0.25 at 30 and 90 days post-treatment, respectively) and of pain (visual analogue scale [VAS]: 1.94 and 1.87 at 30 and 90 days, respectively) compared with patients treated with BTX-A injections and ES (MAS: 2.37, 2.18 and 2.18, respectively) (p < 0.05) (SFS: 1.5 and 1.06, respectively) (p < 0.05) (VAS: 2.44 and 2.69 respectively) (p < 0.05). ESWT enhances the effect of BTX-A to a greater extent than ES, probably by modulating rheology of the muscle and neurotransmission at the neuromuscular junction. (E-mail: angelanotarnicola@yahoo.it) (C) 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available