4.5 Article

QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND FOR THE MONITORING OF NOVEL MICROBUBBLE AND ULTRASOUND RADIOSENSITIZATION

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 1212-1221

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.028

Keywords

Quantitative ultrasound; Cell death; Microbubble; Antivascular therapy; Radiation

Funding

  1. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
  2. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
  3. Cancer Care Ontario Research Chair in Imaging and Experimental Therapeutics
  4. Tier II Canada Research Chair in Biomedical Applications of Ultrasound
  5. Terry Fox Foundation
  6. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a need for cancer imaging to provide real-time information about the metabolic and cellular responses of tumours. Quantitative ultrasound techniques have recently been demonstrated to be a potential method of assessing tumour response at the cellular level. Anti-cancer treatments administered to xenograft-bearing mice consisted of radiotherapy and a novel antivascular therapy utilizing encapsulated microbubble agents in the presence of ultrasound. Radiation dose and microbubble concentrations were varied and the treatment modalities were given in combination to assess the possible enhancement of tumour cell death. Quantitative methods were used to non-invasively assess responses. Results demonstrated statistically significant changes in backscatter parameters (midband fit, spectral intercept) in tumours treated with high doses of radiotherapy or a high concentration of microbubbles. Combined treatments demonstrated further increases in ultrasound parameters. Histopathologic assessment was used and tumour cell death was found to correlate with increases in ultrasound parameters. (E-mail: Gregory.Czarnota@sunnybrook.ca) (C) 2012 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available