4.5 Article

SPECKLE TRACKING ULTRASOUND FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIVE MOTION OF FLEXOR TENDON AND SUBSYNOVIAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE IN THE HUMAN CARPAL TUNNEL

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 12, Pages 1973-1981

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.07.004

Keywords

Carpal tunnel; Subsynovial connective tissue (SSCT); Speckle tracking; Velocity vector imaging (VVI); Shear index; Relative motion; Ultrasound

Funding

  1. NIH [AR49823]
  2. NCRR [RR024152]
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [TL1RR024152] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR044391, R01AR049823] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to compare tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking ultrasound to assess the relative motion of flexor tendon and surrounding subsynovial connective tissue (SSCT). Twenty normal human wrists were imaged with an ultrasound scanner. The two ultrasound methods measured the excursion and maximum velocity of the tendon and SSCT while subjects gripped three different sized acrylic tubes and these were correlated with tendon excursions estimated from finger joint angle changes. The maximum velocity ratio (=SSCT/tendon velocity) and the shear index (=(Tendon excursion-SSCT excursion)/Tendon excursion]x100%) were calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient was higher for joint angle/speckle tracking tendon excursion (0.642) than for joint angle/tissue Doppler excursion (0.377). The speckle tracking method could also discriminate differences in maximum velocity ratio and shear index for different tube sizes. We conclude that speckle tracking may be useful in assessing the relative motion of tendon and SSCT. (E-mail: pamadio@mayo.edu) (C) 2009 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available