4.7 Article

Comparisons between conventional, ultrasound-assisted and microwave-assisted methods for extraction of anthraquinones from Heterophyllaea pustulata Hook f. (Rubiaceae)

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 478-484

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.08.023

Keywords

Anthraquinones; Ultrasound-assisted extraction; Microwave assisted extraction

Funding

  1. CONICET
  2. ANPCyT
  3. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba (Argentine)
  4. Universidad Tecnologica Nacional

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work reports a comparative study about extraction methods used to obtain anthraquinones (AQs) from stems and leaves of Heterophyllae pustulata Hook (Rubiaceae). One of the conventional procedures used to extract these metabolites from a vegetable matrix is by successive Soxhlet extractions with solvents of increasing polarity: starting with hexane to eliminate chlorophylls and fatty components, following by benzene and finally ethyl acetate. However, this technique shows a low extraction yield of total AQs, and consumes large quantities of solvent and time. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) have been investigated as alternative methods to extract these compounds, using the same sequence of solvents. It was found that UAE increases the extraction yield of total AQs and reduces the time and amount of solvent used. Nevertheless, the combination UAE with benzene, plus MAE with ethyl acetate at a constant power of 900 W showed the best results. A higher yield of total AQs was obtained in less time and using the same amount of solvent that UAE. The optimal conditions for this latter procedure were UAE with benzene at 50 degrees C during 60 min, followed by MAE at 900 W during 15 min using ethyl acetate as extraction solvent. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available