4.7 Article

Ultrasound assisted reduction of graphene oxide to graphene in L-ascorbic acid aqueous solutions: Kinetics and effects of various factors on the rate of graphene formation

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 1174-1181

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.10.019

Keywords

Graphene; Graphene oxide; Ultrasound; Reduction; Kinetics

Funding

  1. JSPS [22560760]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22560760] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reduction of graphene oxide (GO) to graphene (rGO) was achieved by using 20 kHz ultrasound in L.-ascorbic acid (L-AA, reducing agent) aqueous solutions under various experimental conditions. The effects of ultrasound power, ultrasound pulse mode, reaction temperature, pH value and L-AA amount on the rates of rGO formation from GO reduction were investigated. The rates of rGO formation were found to be enhanced under the following conditions: high ultrasound power, long pulse mode, high temperature, high pH value and large amount of L-AA. It was also found that the rGO formation under ultrasound treatment was accelerated in comparison with a conventional mechanical mixing treatment. The pseudo rate and pseudo activation energy (E-a) of rGO formation were determined to discuss the reaction kinetics under both treatment. The E-a value of rGO formation under ultrasound treatment was clearly lower than that obtained under mechanical mixing treatment at the same condition. We proposed that physical effects such as shear forces, microjets and shock waves during acoustic cavitation enhanced the mass transfer and reaction of L-AA with GO to form rGO as well as the change in the surface morphology of GO. In addition, the rates of rGO formation were suggested to be affected by local high temperatures of cavitation bubbles. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available