4.7 Article

Kinetic modeling and optimization of maceration and ultrasound-extraction of resinoid from the aerial parts of white lady's bedstraw (Galium mollugo L.)

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 525-534

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.07.017

Keywords

Artificial neural network; Galium mollugo L.; Maceration; optimization; Response surface methodology; Ultrasound-assisted extraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, extraction of resinoid from the aerial parts of white lady's bedstraw (Galium mollugo L) using an aqueous ethanol solution (50% by volume) was studied at different temperatures in the absence and the presence of ultrasound. This study indicated that ultrasound-assisted extraction was effective for extracting the resinoid and gave better resinoid yields at lower extraction temperature and in much shorter time than the maceration. A phenomenological model was developed for modeling the kinetics of the extraction process. The model successfully describes the two-step extraction consisting of washing followed by diffusion of extractable substances and shows that ultrasound influences only the first step. The extraction process was optimized using response surface methodology (RMS) and artificial neural network (ANN) models. For the former modeling, the second-order polynomial equation was applied, while the second one was performed bit an ANN-GA combination. The high coefficient of determination and the low MRPD between the ANN prediction and the corresponding experimental data proved that modeling the extraction process in the absence and the presence of ultrasound using ANN was more accurate than RSM modeling. The optimum extraction temperature was determined to be 80 and 40 degrees C, respectively for the maceration and the ultrasound-assisted extraction, ensuring the highest resinoid yield of 22.0 g/100 g in 4 h and 25.1 g/100 g in 30 min, which agreed with the yields obtained experimentally for the same time (21.7 and 25.3 g/100 g, respectively). (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available