4.7 Article

Formulation development and optimization of a novel Cremophore EL-based nanoemulsion using ultrasound cavitation

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 330-345

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.07.001

Keywords

Ultrasound; Cavitation; Aspirin; Nanoemulsion; Response surface methodology (RSM); Central composite design (CCD)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Government of Malaysia [M0025.54.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, response surface methodology (RSM) based on central composite design (CCD) was employed to investigate the influence of main emulsion composition variables, namely drug loading, oil content, emulsifier content as well as the effect of the ultrasonic operating parameters such as pre-mixing time, ultrasonic amplitude, and irradiation time on the properties of aspirin-loaded nanoemulsions. The two main emulsion properties studied as response variables were: mean droplet size and polydispersity index. The ultimate goal of the present work was to determine the optimum level of the six independent variables in which an optimal aspirin nanoemulsion with desirable properties could be produced. The response surface analysis results clearly showed that the variability of two responses could be depicted as a linear function of the content of main emulsion compositions and ultrasonic processing variables. In the present investigation, it is evidently shown that ultrasound cavitation is a powerful yet promising approach in the controlled production of aspirin nanoemulsions with smaller average droplet size in a range of 200-300 nm and with a polydispersity index (PDI) of about 0.30. This study proved that the use of low frequency ultrasound is of considerable importance in the controlled production of pharmaceutical nanoemulsions in the drug delivery system. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available