4.7 Article

Controlling acoustic streaming in an ultrasonic heptagonal tweezers with application to cell manipulation

Journal

ULTRASONICS
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 268-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.04.019

Keywords

Ultrasonic tweezers; Eckart streaming; Acoustic velocity; Particle trapping; Cell patterning

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K029150/1, EP/G012075/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/G012075/1, EP/K029150/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acoustic radiation force has been demonstrated as a method for manipulating micron-scale particles, but is frequently affected by unwanted streaming. In this paper the streaming in a multi-transducer quasi-standing wave acoustic particle manipulation device is assessed, and found to be dominated by a form of Eckart streaming. The experimentally observed streaming takes the form of two main vortices that have their highest velocity in the region where the standing wave is established. A finite element model is developed that agrees well with experimental results, and shows that the Reynolds stresses that give rise to the fluid motion are strongest in the high velocity region. A technical solution to reduce the streaming is explored that entails the introduction of a biocompatible agar gel layer at the bottom of the chamber so as to reduce the fluid depth and volume. By this means, we reduce the region of fluid that experiences the Reynolds stresses; the viscous drag per unit volume of fluid is also increased. Particle Image Velocimetry data is used to observe the streaming as a function of agar-modified cavity depth. It was found that, in an optimised structure, Eckart streaming could be reduced to negligible levels so that we could make a sonotweezers device with a large working area of up to 13 mm x 13 mm. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available