4.4 Article

First experimental proof for aberration correction in XPEEM: Resolution, transmission enhancement, and limitation by space charge effects

Journal

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 23-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.11.004

Keywords

Aberration correction; Space charge; X-ray induced photoelectron emission microscopy; Low energy electron microscopy; Transmission; Lateral resolution

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal German Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF) [05 KS4WWB/4]
  2. German Science Foundation (DFG) [Sonderforschungsbereich 546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The positive effect of double aberration correction in x-ray induced Photoelectron Emission Microscopy (XPEEM) has been successfully demonstrated for both, the lateral resolution and the transmission, using the Au 4f XPS peak for element specific imaging at a kinetic energy of 113 eV. The lateral resolution is improved by a factor of four, compared to a non-corrected system, whereas the transmission is enhanced by a factor of 5 at a moderate resolution of 80 nm. With an optimized system setting, a lateral resolution of 18 nm could be achieved, which is up to now the best value reported for energy filtered XPEEM imaging. However, the absolute resolution does not yet reach the theoretical limit of 2 nm, which is due to space charge limitation. This occurs along the entire optical axis up to the contrast aperture. In XPEEM the pulsed time structure of the exciting soft x-ray light source causes a short and highly intense electron pulse, which results in an image blurring. In contrast, the imaging with elastically reflected electrons in the low energy electron microscopy (LEEM) mode yields a resolution clearly below 5 nm. Technical solutions to reduce the space charge effect in an aberration-corrected spectro-microscope are discussed. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available