4.0 Article

Genetic and Environmental Stability of Intelligence in Childhood and Adolescence

Journal

TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 151-163

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/thg.2014.26

Keywords

intelligence; longitudinal measures; genetic stability; environmental stability; simplex model; heritability; structural equation modeling

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [NWO 668.772, NWO 433-09-220, NWO 051.02.060, NWO-MagW 480-04-004, NWO/SPI 56-464-14192]
  2. European Research Council [ERC-230374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study examined the genetic and environmental contributions to the temporal stability of verbal, non-verbal and general intelligence across a developmental period spanning childhood and adolescence (5-18 years). Longitudinal twin data collected in four different studies on a total of 1,748 twins, comprising 4,641 measurement points in total, were analyzed using genetic adaptations of the simplex model. The heterogeneity in the type of instrument used to assess psychometric intelligence across the different subsamples and ages allowed us to address the auxiliary question of how to optimally utilize the existing longitudinal data in the context of gene-finding studies. The results were consistent across domains (verbal, non-verbal and general intelligence), and indicated that phenotypic stability was driven primarily by the high stability of additive genetic factors, that the stability of common environment was moderate, and that the unique environment contributed primarily to change. The cross-subscale stability was consistently low, indicating a small overlap between different domains of intelligence over time. The high stability of additive genetic factors justifies the use of a linear combination of scores across the different ages in the context of gene-finding studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available