4.0 Article

The Finnish Twin Cohort Study: An Update

Journal

TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 157-162

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/thg.2012.142

Keywords

twins; families; cohort studies; longitudinal; database

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics [213506, 129680]
  2. Academy of Finland [100499, 205585, 118555, 141054]
  3. Global Research Awards for Nicotine Dependence (GRAND)
  4. European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE), FP7-HEALTH-F4-2007 [201413]
  5. NIH [DA12854, AA12502, AA00145, AA09203, AA15416]
  6. Sanger Institute
  7. Nordic Cancer Union
  8. The Finnish Cancer Society
  9. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  10. The Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2002 and 2006, review papers have described the Finnish Twin Cohort and studies conducted on these population-based, longitudinal data sets with extensive follow-up data. Three cohorts have been established: the older twin cohort in the 1970s, and the Finntwin12 and Finntwin16 studies initiated in the 1990s. The present review provides on update on the latest data collections conducted since the previous review. These cover the fourth waves of data collection in the older cohort (twins born before 1958) and Finntwin12 (twins born 1983-1987). The fifth wave of data collection in Finntwin16 (twins born 1975-1979) also included assessments of their spouses/partners. An analysis of mortality in the older cohort from 1975 to 2009 indicates that the mortality of adult twins (as individuals) does not differ from the population at large. Based on the cohorts, many sub-studies with more detailed phenotyping and collection of omics data have been conducted or are in progress. We also contribute to numerous national and international collaborations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available