4.7 Article

An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 2 case study for resource supply and project valuation

Journal

TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 569-580

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2013.04.009

Keywords

Underground urbanism; Deep City Method; Supply inventory; Building project valuation; Suzhou city

Funding

  1. Sino Swiss Science and Technology Cooperation [SSSTC:IZLCZ2123929]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41272314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four underground resources have been seen as having long-term potential to support sustainable urban development: underground space, groundwater, geomaterials and geothermal energy. Utilization of these resources proposes a new paradigm of economic development: underground urbanism. The new management approach named Deep City Method is put forward to aid decision-makers to integrate global potential of the urban underground into city-scale strategic planning. The research output will be presented in form of two papers each with a different focus. Part 1 aims to introduce the concept, process and initial application in Switzerland; Part 2 is devoted to show methodological insight for a new zoning policy in China and investment scenarios for project cost viability. The Part 2 paper will demonstrate a comprehensive evaluation methodology for underground resources beneath the municipality of Suzhou in China, in order to formulate 3D land zoning. Strategic districts in Suzhou city of China are selected for feasibility outlook and, policy instrument proposition. Finally, a new economic index Underground cost efficiency premium has been proposed to aid project developers to justify competitiveness of underground development. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available