4.1 Article

The ATP7B genetic polymorphisms predict clinical outcome to platinum-based chemotherapy in lung cancer patients

Journal

TUMOR BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 8259-8265

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2072-0

Keywords

ATP7B; Polymorphism; Lung cancer; Platinum; Chemotherapy; Efficacy

Categories

Funding

  1. National High-tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA02A517]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81173129, 81202595, 81373490]
  3. Program for the Special Scientific Research Foundation of Doctor Disciplines in University of Ministry of Education of China [20110162110034]
  4. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [12JJ7006]
  5. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Projects [2011TT2025, 2012TT2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the influence of ATP7B genetic polymorphism to platinum-based chemotherapy in Chinese Han lung cancer patients. A total of 338 Chinese Han lung cancer patients were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent at least two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Four tag SNPs of ATP7B (rs1061472, rs9535826, rs7999812, and rs9535828) were selected to evaluate their impacts to platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients. ATP7B rs9535828 and rs9535826 were found to be associated with platinum resistance in Chinese Han lung cancer patients. Patients with A allele in ATP7B rs9535828 presented an increased susceptibility to platinum drugs (OR 1.96, 95 % CI 1.17-3.30, p < 0.01). Patients with G allele in ATP7B rs9535826 had the highest susceptibility to platinum drugs (OR 2.05, 95 % CI 1.19-3.52, p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that ATP7B genetic polymorphisms could affect the therapeutic efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy, and ATP7B gene might be considered as predictive markers for the efficacy evaluation of platinum-based chemotherapy in Chinese Han lung cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available