4.1 Article

TERT rs2736100 polymorphism contributes to lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis including 49,869 cases and 73,464 controls

Journal

TUMOR BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 5569-5574

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-1734-2

Keywords

Lung cancer; Telomerase reverse transcriptase; Meta-analysis; Polymorphism

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [11411951202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170025]
  3. National Ministry of Science and Technology [2011ZX09302-003-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some studies investigated the association of TERT rs2736100 polymorphism with lung cancer (LC). But the results were not consistent. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the association between rs2736100 and LC. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched. Data were extracted, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 19 studies including 49,869 cases and 73,464 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, a significant association between TERT rs2736100 polymorphism and LC risk was observed (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI 1.18-1.28, P < 0.00001). This polymorphism was also significantly associated with LC risk in Asians (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.22-1.33, P < 0.00001), Caucasians (OR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.10-1.18, P < 0.00001), female patients (OR = 1.37, 95 % CI 1.24-1.51, P < 0.00001), male patients (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI 1.15-1.31, P < 0.00001), adenocarcinoma patients (OR = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.28-1.41, P < 0.00001), squamous cell carcinoma patients (OR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.04-1.21, P = 0.002), small cell lung cancer patients (OR = 1.09, 95 % CI 1.03-1.16, P = 0.004), current smokers (OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.17-1.27, P < 0.00001), former smokers (OR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.08-1.21, P < 0.0001), and never smokers (OR = 1.37, 95 % CI 1.31-1.43, P < 0.00001), respectively. This meta-analysis suggested that TERT rs2736100 polymorphism was a risk factor for LC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available