4.1 Article

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in intermediate and locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Journal

TUMOR BIOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 1729-1736

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-0710-6

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy; Adjuvant chemotherapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) showed a significant improvement in disease control and clinical outcome in patients with intermediate and locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (stage II, III and IVA+B). However, there has been debate about the contribution and application of additional adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to a CCRT regime. This study aims to evaluate the additional value of AC in the treatment of intermediate and locally advanced NPC with regard to toxicity and clinical outcomes. A total of 189 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II to stage IVB NPC were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, toxicity, compliance with treatment and clinical outcomes, including response to treatment, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), freedom from local recurrence (FLR) and freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), were analyzed. The overall response rate of CCRT and CCRT/AC groups was 97.92 % and 97.83 %, respectively (P = 0.643). The 5-year OS rate was 68.2 % in the CCRT group and 75.9 % in the CCRT/AC group (P = 0.53). The 5-year PFS rate was 66.7 % and 71.4 % in CCRT and CCRT/AC groups, respectively (P = 0.96). This study showed no evidence of an additional value of AC in CCRT treatment in disease control and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced NPC in endemic regions. Moreover, three additional cycles of AC after CCRT appeared to be poorly tolerated in patients. Therefore, AC should not be routinely used for treatment, although clinical trials may be justified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available