4.1 Article

CYP2E1 PstI/RsaI polymorphism and interaction with alcohol consumption in hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility: evidence from 1,661 cases and 2,317 controls

Journal

TUMOR BIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 979-984

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-012-0326-2

Keywords

CYP2E1; Polymorphism; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Medicine, Health, and Science [2010KYB127]
  2. China National Natural Science Fund [81072209]
  3. Zhejiang Gong Yi Xing Technology Application Project [2011C33045]
  4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Taizhou Municipal Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have suggested that cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) gene might be involved in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the results have been inconsistent. In this study, the authors performed a meta-analysis to clarify the association between Pst I/Rsa polymorphism in the CYP2E1 gene and HCC risk. PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for eligible publications. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. Fifteen studies (1,661 HCC cases and 2,317 controls) were identified for the data analysis. The overall result showed that there was no statistically significant association between CYP2E1 Pst I/Rsa polymorphism and HCC risk (c2/c2 vs. c1/c1, OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.06; c1/c2 vs. c1/c1, OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.33; c2/c2+ c1/c2 vs. c1/c1, OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.77-1.26; c2/c2 vs. c1/c2+ c1/c1, OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.06). Further stratified analyses indicated that the habitual alcohol drinkers with c2 alleles were more likely to develop HCC (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.19-2.51), compared with the non-habitual drinkers with c1 homozygote. The meta-analysis indicated that CYP2E1 Pst I/Rsa polymorphism was not associated with HCC risk, while the interaction between Pst I/Rsa polymorphism and alcohol consumption increased the risk of HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available